Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.
Date: April 30, 2024 Tue
Time: 12:05 am
Time: 12:05 am
Results for intensive community orders
2 results foundAuthor: Khan, Sabena Title: Initial Analysis of the Impact of the Intensive Alternatives to Custody Pilots on Re-offending Rates Summary: The Intensive Alternatives to Custody (IAC) pilot programme ran from April 2008 to March 2011 to test the use of intensive community orders in diverting offenders from short-term custodial sentences. The Ministry of Justice have undertaken initial analysis to compare re-offending rates for offenders receiving IAC with a well-matched control group receiving short custodial sentences and a well-matched control group receiving court orders. This paper summarises the key findings. Details: London: Ministry of Justice, 2012. 10p. Source: Internet Resource: Research Summary 5/12: Accessed July 17, 2012 at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/iac-impact-evaluation-research-summary.pdf Year: 2012 Country: United Kingdom URL: http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/iac-impact-evaluation-research-summary.pdf Shelf Number: 125658 Keywords: Alternative to Incarceration (U.K.)Community SupervisionIntensive Community OrdersRe-OffendingRecidivism |
Author: Wong, Kevin Title: Intensive Alternatives to Custody Process Evaluation of Pilots in Five Areas Summary: A qualitative process evaluation of five Intensive Alternative to Custody (IAC) pioneer areas was undertaken to assess implementation of IAC, identify approaches to implementation and capture the lessons learnt. The findings indicated that many of the persistent offenders (those with at least 29 prior convictions) targeted by pilots were positive about the IAC order. Although intensive, it provided order and stability, allowing them to move away from a criminal lifestyle. Sentencers welcomed the order as a viable alternative to custody. Probation staff and partners were equally positive about its efficacy. Only one in four IAC orders were revoked because requirements were breached, which suggests that the pilots had managed to engage many of the offenders. Details: London: Ministry of Justice, 2012. 58p. Source: Internet Resource: Ministry of Justice Research Series 12/12: Accessed July 30, 2012 at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/iac-process-evaluation-pilots-five-areas.pdf Year: 2012 Country: United Kingdom URL: http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/iac-process-evaluation-pilots-five-areas.pdf Shelf Number: 125793 Keywords: Alternatives to Incarceration (U.K.)Community SupervisionIntensive Community Orders |